Skip to main content

URBAN SANITATION IN INDIA

URBAN SANITATION IN INDIA

Sanitation is defined as safe disposal of human excreta including its safe confinement treatment disposal and associated hygiene practices. Sanitation is also depend on other elements like environmental sanitation along with the management of drinking water supply.

Sanitation in India is becoming more and more problematic . There are so 
many attributable factors responsible for this situation . 

• Sanitation it self is in crisis ,its not only in India this is through out the world . 

• 2.6 billion people worldwide - 40% of the world's population - do not have a toilet. Yet, despite the fact that 5,000 children die every day from diarrhoeal diseases, there has been no political action on the issue.

• the millennium development goals clearly stated the importance of water and sanitation the fact is water and sanitation is the most neglected and most off-track of the UN millennium development goals

• Developing countries like India and sub Saharan African countries the cost 
of not investing in sanitation and water are huge - infant deaths, lost work 
days, and missed school are estimated to have an economic cost of around 
$38 billion per year, with sanitation accounting for 92% of this value3. In the 
world for every 15 seconds a child was dyeing of water related diseases.

What is the situation in India?

India stands second place amongst the worst places in the world for sanitation.

• Around 40 million people reside in slums, without adequate water and 
sanitation

• India will have 41% of its population living in cities and towns by 2030 i.e. 
over 575 million people from present 286 million. But they can't have water 
and sanitation till we recognize their existence.

• 27.8% of Indians, i.e. 286 million people or 55 million households live in 
urban areas - projections indicate that the urban population would have 
grown to 331 million people by 2007 and to 368 million by 2012. 12.04 
million (7.87 %) Urban households do not have access to latrines and defecate 
in the open. 5.48 million (8.13%) Urban households use community latrines 
and 13.4 million households (19.49%) use shared latrines. 12.47 million 
(18.5%) households do not have access to a drainage network. 26.83 million 
(39.8%) households are connected to open drains. The status in respect of the 
urban poor is even worse6 

• The overall sanitation coverage in India in 2005-2006 is 44.6% . The rural 
sanitation is 26% and urban sanitation is 84.6% only .however field studies 
shown that very low usage of latrines in both rural and urban areas . 74% of 
people in rural India still don't have a toilet and in urban it is 16%7. There is a 
gradual change in sanitation coverage in India and the trend is increasing over 

the past two decades . But if it will take place in the same pace it may take 
another 200 years to get a toilet for every Indian.

The real situation may even worse than the above facts. Water and sanitation 
are basic amenities and responsibility of the government.

Factors that are responsible for poor sanitation in India

India is a unique country with different geographic and climatic conditions. 

This is the major factor to impact any decision or policy implementation at 
central level.

India is urbanizing very fast and along with this, the slum population is also 
increasing. India's urban population is increasing at a faster rate than its total 
population. 

With over 575 million people, India will have 41% of its population living in cities 
and towns by 2030 AD from the present level of 286 million and 28%. 
However, most of them are not having basic facilities like drinking water and 

sanitation. Among the urban poor, the slum dwellers are the poorest. 

The very definition of slums points at acute drinking water and sanitation crisis for the 
slum dwellers. 

As per the 2001 census of India, 640 towns spread over 26 states and union territories 
have reported existence of slums. This means one out of every four persons reside in 
slums in our cities and towns.

• This growing slum population and the lack of basic facilities will badly 
impact on India's overall target achievement in water and sanitation sector4 
in view of the above situation Govt. of India had launched The National 
sanitation policy .

The specific goals of the policy were
• Awareness Generation and Behaviour Change
• Open Defecation Free Cities
• Integrated City-Wide Sanitation

Key Sanitation Policy Issues

In order to achieve the above Vision, following key policy issues must be 
addressed:

• Poor Awareness: Sanitation has been accorded low priority and there is poor 
awareness about its inherent linkages with public health.

• Social and Occupational aspects of Sanitation: Despite the appropriate 
legal framework, progress towards the elimination of manual scavenging 
has shown limited success, Little or no attention has been paid towards the 
occupational hazard faced by sanitation workers daily.

• Fragmented Institutional Roles and Responsibilities: There are considerable 
gaps and overlaps in institutional roles and responsibilities at the national, 
state, and city levels. Lack of an Integrated City-wide Approach: Sanitation 
investments are currently planned in a piece-meal manner and do not take 
into account the full cycle of safe confinement, treatment and safe disposal.

• Limited Technology Choices: Technologies have been focused on limited 
options that have not been cost-effective, and sustainability of investments 
has been in question.

• Reaching the UN-served and Poor: Urban poor communities as well 
other residents of informal settlements have been constrained by lack of 
tenure, space or economic constraints, in obtaining affordable access to safe 
sanitation. In this context, the issues of whether services to the poor should 
be individualized and whether community services should be provided in 
non notified slums should be addressed. However provision of individual 
toilets should be prioritized. In relation to "Pay and Use" toilets, the issue 
of subsidies inadvertently reaching the non-poor should be addressed by 
identifying different categories of urban poor.

• Lack of Demand Responsiveness: Sanitation has been provided by public 
agencies in a supply- driven manner, with little regard for demands and preferences of households as customers of sanitation services.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Four eras in Communication Theory

Eras of Media Theory There are four main eras of media theory. The four eras are mass society, scientific perspective, limited effects and cultural criticism. Theories are constructed within media technology eras. These theories came about due to changes in society and politics. Era of Mass Society This era of theory started in the latter part of the 19th century. Media was seen as influential but negative. This era is characterized as a time in which people were worried about the power that media had to influence average people. People feared that media would ruin the value of society. Theories that came about during this time are : the propaganda theory and  magic bullet theory. Propaganda is a method of communication that aims to influence attitudes and behaviors. Propaganda was used heavily in both World Wars and the Cold War. It has also been historically used in N.Korea and other communist nations. Adolf Hitler’s propaganda had the following characteristi

Theories and Paradigm of Development

The theories can be divided into two categories. 1. Unilinear world views of development. 2.Non-Unilinear world views of development In this section,' we shall discuss various development theories and paradigms. Over the years in many parts of the world, various developmental aims have been pursued by groups of people. We have seen, earlier in the unit, that the purpose of development is not one, neither is it uniform. For one nation, it may be to achieve total literacy, for some it may be drinking water, for other it may be building of motorable roads, for still others it may be reforestation. Depending on the aims, a certain process has been employed for development this process has been tried over and over again till it was refined. In other words, the process with its various trials became a theory. The development processes emanate from some philosophy. Therefore, a particular philosophy can have a group of developmental processes. In easy understanding, we might

Dance Model / Helical model of communication

Introduction In 1967, Frank Dance  proposed the communication model called Dance’s Helix Model for a better communication process. The name helical comes from “Helix” which means an object having a three-dimensional shape like that of a wire wound uniformly around a cylinder or cone. He shows communication as a dynamic and non-linear process. Theory Dance’s model emphasized the difficulties of communication. Frank Dance uses the form of a Helix to describe communication process. He developed this theory based on a simple helix which gets bigger and bigger as it moves or grows. The main characterstic of helical model of communication is that it is evolutionary. Frank Dance explains the communication process based on this Helix structure and compares it with communication. In the Helix structure, the bottom or starting is very small then it’s gradually moves upward in a back and forth circular motion which form the bigger circle in the top and its still moves further. Th